The problem of recognition is particularly observable among the Asian countries, where unlike those in Europe covered by the Bologna Process, up to now there has not been any consensus on the equivalence of degrees and learning outcomes. Under this priority, there are five ASEM initiatives that involve discussions among groups of experts and policy makers at the national level, followed by with a larger seminar involving institutional managers.<\/p>\n
Thus far, there have been several documents produced under the ASEM initiatives of the First Priority. These documents can be referred to by the ASEM countries as they increase transparency of each country\u2019s quality assurance system and recognition guidelines. These include the Asian National Information Centres\u2019 Website (ANICCW), Handbook of Guidelines, Principles and Good Practices on Recognition, Guidelines of Student Mobility, Guidelines on Transcripts, and Compendium on Credits and Learning Outcomes. These documents can be viewed as tangible products of the five Pillar 2 initiatives in this First Priority.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
The problem of recognition is particularly observable among the Asian countries, where unlike those in Europe covered by the Bologna…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":685,"parent":143,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"page-priority-areas-subpage.php","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_helpful_status":1,"inline_featured_image":false,"_exactmetrics_skip_tracking":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_active":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_note":"","_exactmetrics_sitenote_category":0,"ngg_post_thumbnail":0,"footnotes":""},"acf":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"yoast_head":"\n